Home Blog

3 Surprising Lessons from the Trump-Clinton Campaign

Trump-Clinton Campaign
Trump-Clinton Campaign

We pretty much saw it all during Trump-Clinton campaign. The Democrat nominee was not much of a surprise, but on the Republican side, it seemed a bit like a publicity stunt when Donald Trump first took the stage (with 16 others) during the primary debates.

I’m not sure what the Vegas line on Trump was at the time, but I’m guessing a $100 bet back in August 2015 would have yielded lottery-sized winnings on Election Day.

We had conventional wisdom shaken up, we had the media exploited as never before, and we had a result that most could not have imagined possible just 18 months before. Three critical business lessons stand out in the aftermath of the most remarkable election campaign of the past 70 years.

Trump-Clinton Campaign
Trump-Clinton Campaign

1. The Underdog Can Win
Hillary Clinton, following in the footsteps of Obama and with a lifetime of political experience, seemed poised to win. But after eight years, many tired of having Democrats in charge. Was it due to the sluggish economy, despite the administration’s best efforts to convince voters it was booming?

Was it the instability of the Middle East and the threat of ISIS? Was it because the Cubs won the World Series, and that was enough to convince the electorate that the end was nigh unless something changed? Well, probably not the last one—but with Trump routinely drawing rock star-sized crowds for his appearances, there were clues that something unprecedented was afoot.

Apparently, everyone hated Trump except the voters – despite what millions felt was an uncertain commodity with sketchy packaging.

The lesson: never count the underdog out, despite what seems to be apparent on the surface. If there is dissatisfaction with an AMC, a technology vendor or a settlement services provider, the top of mind candidates are the ones that will be considered first. Don’t let your brand go unnoticed. Become a contender, a thought leader and the logical choice when prospects desire to change.

2. We Are Influenced by the News
Hillary was impacted by the FBI investigations and her opponent’s allegations of corruption; Trump was accused of every sort of hate crime, which is still fueling post-election protests. The news undoubtedly had a huge impact on the outcome of the election, even if it came in a form the news media did not anticipate.

In fact, news coverage replaced advertising for Trump to a tremendous degree. No matter what he did, it was covered – to the chagrin of candidates throughout the primaries and into November. This calls to mind the old Hollywood adage that any publicity is good publicity, or “I don’t care what the papers say as long as they spell my name right.” Of course, this is usually not true in business, even if it worked for Donald Trump.

The lesson: appearing in the media with positive news can influence how your prospects perceive you more than virtually any other factor. With the right publicity on your side, the impact can be “Yuge.”

The news media influences your prospects in their decision-making, whether or not they are aware of it. News coverage is subliminally powerful, creating lasting impressions. If there are stories that depict you as an expert and quote you as such, that lends tremendous credibility to your cause.

Also, once reporters have successfully interviewed you, they may include you on their “shortlist” of experts for future interviews on similar topics, so there is a snowball effect that can lead to stories that spotlight you and your offerings.

Just as importantly, industry publications love thought leadership articles from industry experts, especially as they predict future issues or provide meaningful insight on prevailing problems.

Trump-Clinton Campaign
Trump-Clinton Campaign

3. Image Matters
Unlike campaigns of recent history, neither politician won over the masses with their image. On one side we had a bizarrely-coifed, spray-tanned Trump. On the other, we had Hillary Clinton, who looked more mainstream but to many appeared fake, uncharismatic and robotic.

These candidates were far outside the usual politically squeaky-clean requisite norm – and we had more voters than ever who said they could not vote for either one in good conscience.

That is a startling statement about the image of the two finalists for the most powerful elected position in the world. Now consider the impact on the election if either had possessed a great image; there’s a good chance the outcome would not have been nearly as close.

The lesson: like politicians, companies and their executives have an image that invariably sways prospects. Would you want to be associated with a company that has a poor image? Companies and executives have a unique opportunity to create a prospect-friendly image with strategic messaging and visually appealing branding.

Image is not a replacement for substance, but it helps newcomers display their merits and enables established players to create distinguishing elements that influence success as few other things can.

Brad Hodge confronted on Social media after commenting on Virat Kohli

Brad Hodge confronted
Brad Hodge confronted

Brad Hodge confronted much trolling on social media after he remarked on movie attributes Indian cricket team celebrities, Virat Kohli and Rishabh Pant.

They will play warm-up matches on May 25 and 28 from New Zealand and Bangladesh respectively.


Former Australia cricketer Brad Hodge faced lots of trolling on social media after he commented on video features Indian cricket team stars Virat Kohli and Rishabh Pant. Kohli posted a movie of the two cricketers promoting a product on which Hodge said:”Amazing what people do for money.”

Brad Hodge confronted
Brad Hodge confronted

The remarks didn’t go down well with the Twitter users since they started trolling him for his comments and the former Aussie cricketer had to issue a clarification.

“Funny, I did state there was nothing wrong with it. I’d do the same. Your interpretation of my remark was ‘glass half full’ if I attach?. Your interpretation would differ.”

For more news, keep on reading on News Google

“Amazing how brutal people are in reaction. So negative and glass half full. I was not talking in a negative tone. I’d do the same if asked and paid,” Hodge wrote on Twitter.

“As I stated amazing what people do for money,” Hodge tweeted on that video.

OnePlus 7 is here with camera update and google lense

OnePlus 7
OnePlus 7

The OnePlus 7 may seem severely watered down compared to the OnePlus 7 Pro, but it truly isn’t. It makes do with a smaller screen – 6.41-inch when compared with 6.67-inch – with a lower resolution and routine 60Hz refresh rate, and a notch.

But it’s nevertheless an AMOLED panel along with the diagonal that is smaller actually allows the phone to become smaller. Make no mistake, the OnePlus 7 Pro is an enormous phone taller and thicker than a Samsung Galaxy Note9.

OnePlus 7
OnePlus 7

The OnePlus 7 also includes a battery, but it might end up fitting or beating the OnePlus 7 Pro battery life due to the smaller display with the refresh rate. Probably the biggest reason to opt for the OnePlus 7 Pro over the OnePlus 7 is that the camera – the Guru has a 48MP f/1.8 chief, 16MP f/2.2 ultrawide and 8MP f/2.4 3x telephoto mix, while the OnePlus 7 only receives the 48MP one (and a somewhat futile 5MP f/2.4 depth sensor).

OnePlus 7 Pro: Three cameras, three times the fun?

Yet there is no denying that the bulk of your shots will probably be done with the most important 48MP one. And selfie fans will soon be dropping nothing as at front sits precisely the same 16MP f/2.0 snapper as on the Pro version. Sure your display is being eaten into by this one, but you don’t need to wait for the mechanism every time.

OnePlus 7
OnePlus 7

If you’re into productivity that the OnePlus 7 gets the same zippy Snapdragon 855 chipset with 6GB or 8GB of RAM and UFS 3.0 storage as the 7 Pro. These are, in fact, the first two phones with the gen storage, outdoing Google Pixel 3 the Galaxy S10 and Huawei P30 Pro.

Have a long look we do not see phones that come close to OnePlus 7 as a package for this amount of money. The smaller battery and that is about it although you really do have the Xiaomi Mi 9 using its camera.

A large portion of picking between those two will probably be deciding in the event that you prefer OxygenOS or MIUI. Well, the fact that the majority of markets and that don’t have access.

This is OnePlus’ most versatile camera phone to date.

OnePlus did a stunt that is close impossible – it created a phone whilst still giving focus on this brand’s basic principles – the normal OnePlus phone. We would say that is job well done.

OnePlus 7
OnePlus 7

The OnePlus 7 also has the new, larger fingerprint scanner within the screen. Along with the stereo speakers, also.

OnePlus 7 Pro and OnePlus 7 price and availability

Factor in the price – that the OnePlus 7 begins at $550/INR 33,000 for its 6GB/128GB and $600/INR 38,000 for the 8GB/128GB. Those are meaningful savings in contrast to the Guru and maintain the phone away from competition such as the Galaxy S10 and Huawei P30 Pro.

OnePlus 7
OnePlus 7

With the specs and price out of their way, the OnePlus 7 feels exactly like a OnePlus 6T (which will still be available in select markets at a lower cost ). That’s to say it seems like a premium product at a lower-than-expected price.

Plus, if you manage the OnePlus 7 only after the OnePlus 7 Guru its lightness instantly strikes you. While not a mild cellphone with no stretch, the OnePlus 7 feels just like a reasonably-sized device, whereas the 7 Pro is gargantuan.

For more updates, keep visiting News Google

14 Telltale Signs It’s Time For A Career Change

Time For A Career Change
Time For A Career Change

14 Telltale Signs It’s Time For A Career Change

First and foremost, a job is a source of a paycheck. But ideally, it should also offer you other gains, like stimulating challenges, a sense of accomplishment, and opportunities for advancement.

If you have found yourself stuck in a profession that is lacking in more ways than one, you might be considering a career change.

And you’re certainly not alone. According to LinkedIn, millennials are 50% more likely to relocate and 16% more likely to switch industries for a new job than non-millennials.

And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking. Don’t settle. But deciding to leave behind a steady job to take a chance on a new profession can be difficult — and scary. Here are 14 ways to know that it might be time to switch careers.

Time For A Career Change
Time For A Career Change

According to OfficeVibe, 70% of US workers are not engaged with their work, and while 90% of leaders think an engagement strategy would help their employees, fewer than 25% actually have one in place. If you’re in a job or industry that’s leaving you unchallenged and bored, then it might be time to move on.

Ideally, we walk into each workday with a passion for our calling and the zeal to tackle what’s ahead. But if you notice yourself sinking into a sense of apathy, and you simply don’t care about what you’re doing anymore, then it’s time to take a good, hard look at the situation.

Some people are happy to permanently stay in their current position, and that’s just fine! But if you have aspirations of moving up in your industry and you’re not being promoted, you might be in the wrong business. (That said, promotions are earned, so if you’re expecting to be promoted after a few months on the job, that’s a different issue.) Whether you’re not suited for higher-level positions or there’s no room to move up, you might want to explore an industry where there’s more opportunity for advancement.

A whopping 89% of employers think that employees leave their jobs for more money, when in fact only 12% actually do. However, not making enough money to support the lifestyle you have and/or want is a perfectly reasonable reason to aim for a new career.

Being unhappy at your job can go far beyond boredom and apathy (although those are troubling enough feelings). Many careers inherently come with physical and mental demands, but if it’s gotten to the point where those demands are negatively affecting your well-being in some way, then you might want to consider if this is the right place for you to be.

Despite your own success and perhaps the success of the company you work for, industry hits can be hard to take. According to LinkedIn, millennials have been abandoning retail, government, education, nonprofit, and media industries in recent years. And where are they headed? To search for work in the tech, health care, and finance areas. If your industry is sluggish, then perhaps you should look at these hot fields as well.

Certain industries have location-specific hubs — like the entertainment industry is predominantly centred in Los Angeles, and the media industry is big in New York — and that might not fit with your dream of living on a ranch in Montana. Sometimes it’s possible to relocate within your own industry, but if that’s not a likely possibility, a career switch might be the best option if geography is important to you.

Opting for a new career could require new skills and additional expertise. So if you find the idea of going back to school exciting, as opposed to daunting, then you might be ready to make the leap into a new profession. You should also keep in mind that there are plenty of options when it comes to additional education, such as full-time and part-time programs to suit your schedule.

While you might have moved up the ladder in your current profession, switching careers could mean that you’ll have to start from the bottom again. It’s not necessarily easy to apply for entry-level jobs when you’ve been a working professional for years, and it can be awkward when your superiors are younger than you, but if you really want to explore a new industry, then you need to be willing to pay your dues all over again.

They say if you love what you do, you never have to work a day in your life. While that may or may not be true, if you’re not feeling fulfilled in your current job, then you might want to take a look at your hobbies to find a new direction. However, you should also be aware of the drawbacks of turning a beloved pastime into a money-making endeavour.

Starting a new career doesn’t necessarily mean starting from scratch. If you already have a thriving side hustle, it might be the perfect opportunity to focus on it and launch a full-time business that will allow you to leave behind one industry for another that you’ve already dipped your toes into.

If you’ve spotted a niche that needs to be filled, then this could be your big chance to make your mark. Whether you’re creating a new space within your current profession or are considering a jump into an entirely new vocation, creating a space for yourself is often a better option than trying to eke out a spot in an already saturated industry.

Leaving a job to take a chance on an entirely new career can be risky, and it can temporarily turn your life into a career-based roller coaster filled with exciting highs — and scary lows. That’s why you might want to make sure your life is stable enough to handle a major change. While there may never be a perfect time to take the leap, if you’re about to have a baby or buy a house, you might want to wait for a more opportune moment to switch careers. But if it appears to be smooth sailing ahead, then this could be the safest time to dive into your big endeavour.

Switching careers can often mean that your finances take a temporary hit. You might end up without a paycheck while you’re transitioning from one job to another, you might need to hand over big bucks for additional education, or you might have to take an entry-level job that pays much less than what you currently make.

Before you quit your job to explore a new career, be sure that you have enough money tucked away in your savings account, or you have a partner to help pay the bills so that you don’t end up in a tight spot. But if you have a financial safety net, then this could be the perfect time to roll the dice.

For more info, keep on visiting New Google

Parents, Let’s Talk About The Huge Sacrifice That Is Kids And Sports


Parents, Let’s Talk About The Huge Sacrifice That Is Kids And Sports

As parents, we make more sacrifices for our kids over the course of their lifetime than most of us can possibly count.

Some are big, some are small, but all are designed with the same purpose of improving the quality of our child’s life. It’s just one small part of being a parent and it’s something we all know we’re going to have to do well before the sperm and the egg make their little love connection.

But let’s talk for a second about one sacrifice in particular. It’s probably not one of the top-tier sacrifices that you’d expect me to be talking about, like moving cross country for a better-paying job or spending night after sleepless night caring for a colicky baby, or listening to nothing but cheesy Top 40 pop radio in the car from the time your kids are in fifth grade until they’re old enough to drive.


I’m talking about youth sports.
Youth sports is most definitely a lower-level give-up on the sacrifice chart, but it’s still relevant.

It’s the one so many of us make in the spirit of giving our kids the experience of being part of something bigger than just little-old them.

It’s the one that transforms our otherwise quiet and lazy weekends into a white-hot chaotic messes, filled with endless car rides, hours of sitting on cold bleachers or in saggy lawn chairs with numb fingers and frozen toes.

I’m talking about the languid, relaxing weekends we give up to enable our kids to be part of a sports team.

And for those of us who’ve spent season after season out in the damp cold, blowing into our hands, losing feeling in our toes, and begging our coffee to stay hot just a little longer, you know exactly what I’m talking about.

Now it’s probably because the spring sports season is in full swing in my cozy little town, and the sidelines and bleachers are all filled to capacity, that I’ve made an interesting observation. And what I’ve realized is that as much as I may’ve complained and moaned in the privacy of my own head about the endless car rides and sudden-death overtimes and playoff games, I’m actually jealous of all the young families who are newbies in the world of youth sports.

See, you do a lot of self-reflecting when one of your kids graduates from high school. And since my oldest daughter just graduated, I’ve been doing a lot of reminiscing about when my kids were young.

This, in turn, has led me to pause and relive a lot of my favourite moments over the years. And surprisingly enough, I’ve realized how many of those beautiful moments involved watching my kids practice or play on their various sports teams.

That three-hour-long track meets out in the early spring cold waiting for Libby to throw the javelin or Riley to run her 400 meters—events that are so quick you can miss them if you so much as sneeze at the wrong time—are priceless.

And I think every one of us who puts everything on hold just to be able to cheer for our kids knows that these are some of our most cherished moments as parents. I mean really, what’s more, endearing or hilarious than watching your five-year-old son score the winning basket for the other team on the basketball court? Or having ten soaking-wet ten-year-old girls piled in your car for a rain delay during a soccer game. Or cuddling under a blanket with a couple of other moms on the sidelines trying to share body heat.

These are all little gifts—gifts we wouldn’t have if we didn’t sacrifice our time and freedom to make them happen.

Because when you add up all the hours spent taking our kids to and from practices, all the time travelling back and forth to games, and then all the hours spent watching them play, you’re talking about a pretty good-size investment of time and energy and, if you’re like me, vocal cords.

But what we realize, usually after those days are long gone, is how much we loved those freakishly cold spring mornings or those playoff games or that hunt for the missing cleat when you’re already running late.
We love it because it gives our kids something we can’t give them alone. It gives them the experience of working as a team and of what it means to depend on the people around them and to feel the thrill of the win and the heartbreak of defeat—life lessons you learn best when you live them yourself.

So yes, diehard fan of my children as I am, I admit that I’ve secretly prayed for Noah’s Ark-type rain on weekend mornings to wash out any possibility of a game, or a loss in the playoffs so the season ended quicker; but at the end of the day, I’d go back in a blink and do it all over again.

And so would you. I’d just be doing it in one of those portable sideline shelters and wearable sleeping bags. I’m not stupid after all.

For more from Lisa Sugarman,  click here for an exclusive offer to order her book Untying Parent Anxiety.

For more info, keep on reading news google

Sportscaster Thanks Stranger Who Sent Him Notes

Remove term: Sportscaster Thanks Stranger Sportscaster Thanks Stranger
Remove term: Sportscaster Thanks Stranger Sportscaster Thanks Stranger

Sportscaster Thanks Stranger Who Sent Him Year’s Worth Of Uplifting Notes After Losing His Wife

Simon Thomas is a British sports presenter who describes himself as, “some bloke who has always loved capturing life,” according to his Instagram.

However, something devastating recently happened to Simon and his family. Now, he describes the photos he shares on social media have “taken on a much deeper, more poignant meaning.”

Simon lost his beloved wife Gemma in November of 2017. She was only 40 years old, and her death was anything but expected for Simon or his 8-year-old son, Ethan.

Gemma went to the doctor with flu-like symptoms but was simply sent home for bed rest. Sadly, Gemma’s ailment was not flu-related, but rather a case of undetected leukaemia that was past the point of no return.

The wife and mother passed away just four days after being sent home to rest. Needless to say, the loss was overwhelming for both Simon and Ethan. Luckily, a series of notes are helping get them through this hard time.

Remove term: Sportscaster Thanks Stranger Sportscaster Thanks Stranger
Remove term: Sportscaster Thanks Stranger Sportscaster Thanks Stranger

Photo: Instagram 1, 2 / simonjthomassky

Since Gemma’s passing, Simon has been extremely open about his difficulty coming to terms with his wife’s death.
However, he knows that he has to set a good example and stay strong for their son Ethan, who is also suffering.
Simon decided to do something special for his son, to remind him that he’s still just as loved and supported without his mom around anymore.
To do this, Simon started writing Ethan what he calls “snack notes.”
They’re just little notes of encouragement that Simon placed in Ethan’s lunchbox, but it makes a world of a difference.
This one reads:
Remember my boy — even when you’re feeling sad #TeamThomas never gives up! I love you
Daddy xxx
It’s a new week with lots of different challenges. You were AMAZING last week, you’ll be amazing this week!
I love you, Daddy xxx
After a few months of snack notes posts, Simon received something unexpected in the mail — this time for him.
He explains:
Today’s #snacknote is a bit different. Since Gemma went I have been so moved by the support and messages I get from people on here, people I haven’t even met, yet people who care about me and what I’m going through. A guy called Dan Ritchie, who I have yet to meet (but will) had seen my notes for Ethan and felt I needed some too, to encourage me and help me keep going when I feel like giving up. So he’s written me a daily note too – for every single day of the coming year! That’s #lightinthedarkness right there.

The act of kindness was not taken lightly by Simon or any of his followers on Instagram who has been following his and Ethan’s progress through this dark time.
One user rightfully points out:
This is 1 of the nicest thing I have ever seen somebody do. How thoughtful for this man to do this for somebody he has never met. How wonderful is our generation, truly loving to each other. I’m moved beyond words. Stay strong Simon.

Letters are just some of the ways people have shown their support for Simon.
Simon has also set up a JustGiving page to help raise money for Maggie’s Centres, a charity that lends support to those affected by cancer. It has received hundreds of contributions, that will help others in the same situation.

Be sure to SHARE this touching story with your loved ones!

For more info, Keep on reading News Google

Tom Selleck Opens Up About His Life, Career, And Famous Mustache

Tom Selleck Opens Up About His Life, Career, And Famous Mustache
Tom Selleck Opens Up About His Life, Career, And Famous Mustache

Tom Selleck Opens Up About His Life, Career, And Famous Mustache In Upcoming Memoir. There are some Hollywood stars who are very open with fans about the ins and outs of their everyday lives.

Others prefer to be more reserved, keeping an air of mystery around them. The rise of the social media celebrity continues to introduce new people to the Hollywood scene. It leaves something to be said for the stars of yesteryear who enjoy careers today while still maintaining their privacy. One Hollywood heavyweight has decided to let fans have a closer look at his life on his own terms. Tom Selleck, star of Blue Bloods, is writing a memoir.
Tom has enjoyed a career in Hollywood that has lasted over four decades.

Tom Selleck Opens Up About His Life, Career, And Famous Mustache
Tom Selleck Opens Up About His Life, Career, And Famous Mustache

From his iconic role as Magnum, P.I. to his stint on Friends as Richard to his current role as Frank Reagan, he’s proven to have range and skill. He is one of few stars whose private life doesn’t make the front pages. It’s also why fans of the actor want to know more about him and how he’s kept life balance in the spotlight. He’s opening up about all that and more in a new memoir slated for release later this year.

Tom Selleck has had an impressive career. It isn’t easy to survive four decades in the Hollywood machine, but the charming actor has done just that.

Tom’s rise to the top wasn’t easy. In fact, the first decade of his career consisted of smaller roles and a struggle to break out.
He finally got his chance when he starred in Magnum, P.I. From there, his star continued to rise.

Throughout his career, he’s shown he can do just about anything. He’s gone from comedies to westerns and back again seamlessly.
He surprised many by taking on a supporting role in Friends as Dr. Richard Burke, Monica’s older love interest. He followed that up with a stint on Broadway in A Thousand Clowns.
Today, Tom is best known for his role as New York City Police Commissioner Frank Reagan on Blue Bloods. The show was recently renewed for its 10th season.

Throughout all of this, Tom has managed to keep his private life private. This is no easy feat when you’re a multigenerational celebrity.
Tom has been married twice. He was married to model Jacqueline Ray from 1971 to 1982. He adopted her son from a previous marriage, Kevin, and continued to be in his life following their split.

In 1987, Tom married Jillie Mack. The two have a 30-year-old daughter, Hannah.
Tom and his family live on a ranch in Thousand Oaks, California. The ranch has a Hollywood history of its own, previously belonging to Dean Martin.
All of his experiences have made for a fascinating life. Now the actor is opening up about it in a memoir.

The memoir will be released by Dey Street Books, an imprint of HarperCollins, which gives this description of the book: “Rich with charm, insight, and a surprising dose of self-deprecating humour, this memoir illuminates five decades of Hollywood — and of America.”

Tom started the memoir last summer, according to the Associated Press. He was inspired to write his experiences after so many fans expressed interest in learning more about his life.
The book is currently available for pre-order through HarperCollins. There’s no word on a title yet, but it is slated to be released this November.

For more info, keep on reading news google

David Hasselhoff’s Daughters Are All Grown Up

David Hasselhoff
David Hasselhoff

David Hasselhoff is one of the most well-known American television actors. Born in 1952, “The Hoff” gained recognition for his roles on The Young and the Restless and Knight Rider early in his career.

In 1989, David starred on the show Baywatch. Although it was cancelled after one season, David knew there was more potential, so he revived it himself, serving as executive producer and actor. Today, the show remains what he is best known for, but David’s career has spanned many realms of Hollywood.

David Hasselhoff
David Hasselhoff

Between 1984 and 1989, David was married to Catherine Hickland. After their divorce, David married Pamela Bach. Together, they had two daughters, Taylor Ann and Hayley, born in 1990 and 1992, respectively.

In 2006, Pamela and David got a divorce.
Today, Taylor and Hayley are all grown up. Taylor is a real estate agent in LA, and Hayley is working as an actress and plus-size model. They’ve both been hugely successful in their careers.

Take a look at David Hasselhoff’s stunning daughters in the pictures below!
David Hasselhoff is one of the biggest stars out there — he’s had a huge career in Hollywood.

Recently, he appeared on Dancing With the Stars and The Celebrity Apprentice Australia, and he had a major role in Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No!

When David and Pamela Bach were married, they welcomed two daughters.
Taylor Ann was born May 5, 1990, and Hayley was born August 26, 1992.
They were absolutely adorable little girls, and they loved spending time with each other and their parents.

As kids, Hayley and Taylor even visited their famous dad on-set from time to time!
Now Taylor and Hayley are all grown up and living successful adult lives. Although they could have followed their father’s footsteps into the acting world, Taylor chose to go into real estate, and Hayley went into modeling.

Despite the fact that they’re real adults now, Taylor and Hayley still love spending time with their dad.

Taylor, who was once just a little girl trailing behind her famous father, is now a very successful residential and commercial real estate agent.

#Realtay is coming to the big screen in 2019 💋 #RealEstate

Taylor keeps her Instagram updated with all of her latest real estate listings, showing off some of the most beautiful homes in Los Angeles.

She also recently shared that her real estate business, RealTay, will be “coming to the big screen in 2019.”
Little sister Hayley is also making a name for herself — as a model and actress.
In 2007, when Hayley was only 14, she started modelling professionally.
Hayley was signed with Wilhelmina Models earlier in her career, and now she’s signed with Ford Models.

Both of these modelling agencies are among the most influential in the industry.
Although Hayley is a plus-size model, she just sees herself as normal.
She really embraces her appearance and wants others to feel confident in their own bodies, too.
It’s clear from her pictures that she loves her dad and likes to pay homage to him in her photos.
Just look at her posing next to a life preserver here. Doesn’t it make you think of David’s Baywatch days?

It’s obvious that David is ridiculously proud of both of his daughters.
Even though they grew up in the spotlight, it’s clear that they have good heads on their shoulders.

Hayley may only be in her mid-20s, but she’s definitely following in her successful dad’s footsteps.

She’s a beautiful girl, both inside and out.

Did you have any idea that David Hasselhoff’s daughters were so grown up now?
We can’t wait to see what they do with the rest of their careers!
If you love David Hasselhoff, please SHARE this article with your friends!

For More news, keep reading News Google

Online News Credibility


The number of adults using the Internet to find and read news online is on the rise. One national study by the Pew Research Center reported that weekly use of online news tripled from 11 million to 36 million people in the United States between 1996 and 1998, which the center called “astonishing” (Pew Research Center for People & the Press, 1998). Other studies have shown similar growth in use of the Internet, the World Wide Web, and other online information resources (see, e.g., Jupiter Media Metrix, 2001; Nielsen Media Research, 1999). Multiple concerns about online news and information have emerged in the past decade. These include fear about public access to private information, but also about publication of rumors online, inclusion of personal and institutional biases, the general levels of trust of online news, and the accuracy of information rapidly posted to Web sites during the cycles of breaking news stories. One issue that has emerged because of this growth is the credibility of new information technologies and new media news delivery systems. One analysis reported that barely one in three media Web sites posted privacy policies for information provided both voluntarily (e.g., personal electronic mail addresses or other information taken from user registration forms) and involuntarily (e.g., Web browser cookies or tracking specific page visits and clicks within a Web site) by users (Pryor & Grabowicz, 2001). Even when they are posted, online statements of privacy policy are often lengthy and nearly incomprehensible. They tend to serve more as a legal alibi for the Web site owner than an actual information source for site users. This study investigated the similarities and differences of user perceptions of the credibility of traditional news media delivery systems—newspapers and television news—and the credibility of Web-based online news. Specifically, this chapter investigates news credibility in an attempt to determine the components of news credibility across traditional and new online news media.


Because of content accuracy, reliability, and other related concerns, some observers have predicted a troubled future for online news. Johnson and Kaye (1998) reminded us that one of the basic characteristics of the Internet, its potential free access to everybody to upload information without much scrutiny, might affect the credibility of the medium as a source of information. Flanagin and Metzger (2000) noted that whereas newspapers, books, and television undergo a process of information verification before they reach the public, Internet sites do not always use such measures. The lack of editorial and gatekeeping rules similar to those in the traditional print and broadcast news media is central to the problem. This, of course, is likely to increase the importance of branded online news sites such as CNN.com and perhaps emphasize the value of the so-called halo effect of an existing print or television news organization to its online equivalent (e.g., Time magazine and its Web counterpart, Time Online). Schweiger (1998) pointed out that credibility becomes an important heuristic for content selection at a time of information overload. Credibility may also influence the journalistic and commercial success of a medium (Schweiger, 2000). Online news industry observers and newspaper editors have expressed similar concerns over credibility, believability, ethical lapses, newsgathering techniques, and news presentation (Arant & Anderson, 2000; Lasica, 2001). These and numerous other professional issues are frequent topics of discussion and debate on the pages of the Online Journalism Review (http://ojr.usc.edu). Studies conducted in recent years have analyzed the dimensions of the Internet, the Web, and, to a lesser extent, online news credibility. Flanagin and Metzger (2001) observed that much media credibility research has ignored online news and that the bulk of research was conducted prior to online news development. There are differences, these scholars argued, between online news and other more established news media such as television, radio, and newspapers. Online news can be reported at any time. The newspaper, by contrast, is limited to when people obtain the hard copy. Thus, the dimension of timeliness must be considered in studying credibility of the Internet as a medium. Flanagin and Metzger (2001) concluded that the Internet is a “multidimensional technology used in a similar manner to other more traditional media”. They found online conversational uses such as chat rooms, electronic mail, and the telephone that paralleled traditional media. They also determined information-retrieval and information-giving similarities. They concluded that “needs fulfilled by these channels cluster in ways consistent with past research, regardless of the technologies employed to meet them” (p. 153). In an earlier study, Flanagin and Metzger (2000) investigated perceptions of Internet information credibility in comparison to other media. They concluded that the Internet was as credible as television, radio, and magazines, but not newspapers. They found that credibility varied by medium among different types of information sought by audiences, such as news and entertainment. Respondents reported that they did not verify information found on the Internet, but this finding also varied by the type of information needed. The amount of experience using the Internet and how an individual perceived the information were associated with efforts to verify online information. Schweiger (2000) found newspapers in Germany were rated ahead of the Web and television on 9 of 11 credibility items. He also found that Web users and nonusers alike rate the credibility of the Web as remarkably similar to television and newspapers. Sundar (1996) determined that individuals rated stories with direct quotations from sources to be significantly higher in credibility and quality than those without quotations. The use of direct quotations did not appear to affect subject ratings of liking for online news or perceptions of representativeness or newsworthiness of the online news. Kiousis (1999) found news credibility perceptions to be influenced by media use and interpersonal discussion of news. He found general skepticism about news, but people rated newspapers as more credible than online news or television. Online news, however, was rated more credible than television. Like other studies of print and broadcast news media, Kiousis found the credibility rating of a medium was associated with its use. He also found links between discussion of news and perceptions of television news, but not for online news or newspapers. He offered evidence of links between media use and public perceptions of credibility for newspapers and television news, but not in the assessment of online news. Using credibility as their focus, Johnson and Kaye (1998, 2000) concluded that online news media and online candidate literature were perceived to be more credible than traditional print and broadcast news media, even though both online news and traditional news media were perceived to be somewhat credible. No differences were found for news magazines and issue-oriented sources. Finberg, Stone, and Lynch (2002; see also Online News Association, 2001) found one main concern about online news credibility was the perceptions of other journalists, who do not hold it in high regard. The national study determined that online news was a supplementary news source for most users. They also observed that the public has accepted online news as a credible news option, and that many readers did not feel online news credibility was an issue.


Researchers have utilized a variety of measurements and statistical procedures in their quest to understand media credibility. Bivariate and multivariate approaches have been used, including regression analysis (Mulder, 1980, 1981) and factor analysis (Flanagin & Metzger, 2000; Newhagen & Nass, 1989). Many have used traditional data collection methods such as telephone surveys and laboratory and field experiments. New technologies such as online surveys and other experiments are beginning to be used as well (Johnson & Kaye, 1998; Sundar, 1998). Online surveys using electronic mail and the Web, however, have unresolved methodological issues such as low response rates, self-selection bias, and access (Couper, Traugott, & Lamias, 2001; Schaeffer & Dillman, 1998). Media credibility and believability are closely related and used interchangeably at times in the literature. In conventional use, credibility is typically defined as a facility for inspiring or instilling belief. Something that is credible is thought to offer reason or evidence to be believable or within the range of possibility. If it is believed, it is considered to be true or honest. Believability is a factor in the credibility of a source or medium. Meyer (1973), for example, narrowly defined credibility as whether or not a newspaper was believed by its readers. Robinson and Kohut (1988) found that believability levels for an information medium are not closely related to political and demographic variables that had been found to divide American public opinion. They observed that although the public groups news media according to believability, the resultant groupings are not the same as the differences usually drawn between television and print journalism, although respondents did say that local TV is less likely to be factual than the nation’s major dailies. They concluded that, in 1988 at least, there was “no believability crisis for the press” (p. 188). The study also found that opinions about believability were not associated with one particular medium and, although personality was a factor in believability of individual journalists, it was mostly a factor of organizations and not people or celebrity.


This study investigates the credibility of news across traditional and online media. It examines the dimensions of news credibility as a threshold to what predicts news credibility. Online news credibility is investigated against use patterns and user demographics using the orientation of the Gaziano and McGrath (1986) credibility scale. Credibility research comparing the Internet to traditional news sources has not been conclusive or consistent (Flanagin & Metzger, 2000). Research about print newspapers and online newspapers suggests additional, perhaps new, dimensions may exist. For example, print newspapers are regarded as a serious news medium. Newspapers, after all, by their very name are committed to news. Television news, by contrast, is regarded as less serious because the medium of television is not primarily associated with news, and credibility studies have shown television credibility to be more based on individual on-air personalities such as news anchors than the news organization or station (Newhagen & Nass, 1989). Television news is often viewed as an addendum to the entertainment medium. Similarly, the Internet and the Web are not solely devoted to news. Thus, the “entertainment” dimension must be considered when print and online newspapers are compared. The following research questions guided this study:

1. What are the primary components of newspaper, television news, and online news credibility?

2. What similarities and differences are found in the credibility dimensions of newspapers, television news, and online news?

Uses and Gratifications of Online and Offline News: New Wine in an Old Bottle?


The newspaper once reigned as the dominant news medium in America. Faded black-and-white movies attest to how family members at breakfast tables read sections of the newspaper, which was as much a part of the meal as coffee and orange juice. There was the evening newspaper, too. In succeeding years, newspapers faced competition from radio and, later, television. Now online news threatens the venerable medium. Newspapers have responded by going online,1 reproducing their print media products on the Web with little regard for the different ways audiences may read and process offline and online news (Thalhimer, 1994). This study explores audience members’ motives and uses of online news and offline newspapers. The study aims to facilitate our understanding of the cognitive and affective responses to offline and online news consumption behavior.


A recent review of the empirical literature on audience use of the Internet astutely noted, “In spite of the appropriateness and timeliness of the Internet as a topic of study, we know remarkably little about its selection and use” (Flanagin & Metzger, 2001). Some evidence suggests that Internet users are avid online news consumers (e.g., Aikat, 2000; Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 2001). For example, a recent UCLA Center for Communication Policy (2001) study revealed that 53.6% of the respondents considered the Internet an important source for news information.

Uses of News

Research conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2001) shows steady increases in the use of online news sources and that 63% of online users go online for news. Some studies indicate that the Web may cultivate an informed electorate. A number of studies indicate that Web users are politically sophisticated and active, and that those “who already harbor an interest in political affairs are surfing the Internet, rather than television, for political information” Qohnson & Kaye, 2000, p. 873). An experimental study of American college students’ knowledge of international news reported that even short-term exposure to Web sources about foreign countries increased students’ knowledge about the countries (Griffin et al., 1997). Stempel, Hargrove, and Bernt (2000) found a symbiotic relationship between Internet news use and traditional news consumption that suggests how an online news user may also be an avid information seeker with offline news media. Hence, they contended, online news patronage was not responsible for the general decline in news consumption in the television (both network and local), newspaper, and magazine industries. Comparing these findings with a study on audience preferences across Internet, television, newspaper, radio, and magazine news outlets, the audience still prefers traditional media for general information such as weather, entertainment, sports, and general news (New Media Federation, 2002). Specifically, newspapers were cited as the most preferred source for entertainment news.

Gratifications of News Use

Traditionally, uses and gratifications researchers have been interested in why the audience seeks and consumes media content, including news content. This perspective sees audiences as motivated individuals who actively seek media content to fulfill cognitive and affective needs (e.g., Blumler, 1979; Katz, Blumler, & Gurevitch, 1974; Rayburn, 1996). It is this gratifying media use experience that motivates repeat media gratification seeking through media usage (e.g., Palmgreen, Wenner, & Rayburn, 1981). A number of studies have identified the gratifications associated with news use. For instance, Katz, Guvrevitch, and Hass (1973) identified newspapers as a useful source for learning about society. Newspapers, by contrast, were seen as meeting a wider and less specialized set of needs. Similarly, Elliot and Quattlebaum (1979) found that newspapers provide surveillance of the environment needs but not entertainment. By the same token, Kippax and Murray (1980) tested the perceived importance of 30 media-related needs. They discovered that newspapers were judged as providing eight specific needs associated with an informational function—including understanding, knowledge, and credibility— instead of any emotional needs. Lichtenstein and Rosenfeld’s (1983) study yielded some additional insights. Their findings suggested that radio, television, magazines, and newspapers were regarded as sources of entertainment and information about everyday life. Magazines and newspapers were judged as useful sources of information about the government, but not as outlets for resolving loneliness (or emotional needs). Weaver (1980) suggested yet another news gratification. His findings established that when interest and uncertainty in political information was high, newspaper use was more strongly related to interpersonal discussion of political information than was television viewing.